<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>RF Module on Jice Lavocat</title><link>https://jice.lavocat.name/tags/rf-module/</link><description>Recent content in RF Module on Jice Lavocat</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>fr-FR</language><copyright>All rights reserved - 2016</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jice.lavocat.name/tags/rf-module/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How to use the Scattered formalism using Comsol Multiphysics</title><link>https://jice.lavocat.name/blog/2010/how-to-use-the-scattered-formalism-using-comsol-multiphysics/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jice.lavocat.name/blog/2010/how-to-use-the-scattered-formalism-using-comsol-multiphysics/</guid><description>&lt;p style="text-align: justify;"&gt;
 After my last post about &amp;#8216;&lt;a title="Far field Comsol" href="http://localhost/oldblog/2010/04/how-to-get-the-electromagnetic-scattered-far-field-using-comsol-rf-module/"&gt;getting the scattered far field using ComsolRF module&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#8216; a bunch of problems appeared. Actually, the definition of the incident field, using a line of current is wrong. It prevent the PML to work nicely, and thus, the overall field (and of course the scattered field) will be wrong.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: justify;"&gt;
 To correct this behaviour, one should first start a problem by using the &lt;em&gt;Scattered Formalism Equation Resolution&lt;/em&gt;. If you already have your setup, just go to &lt;strong&gt;Physics&lt;/strong&gt; &gt; &lt;strong&gt;Properties&lt;/strong&gt; and change the &lt;strong&gt;Field Type&lt;/strong&gt; to &amp;#8216;Scattered xxxxx waves&amp;#8217; (where xxxxx is your polarization system : TE, TM or hybrid).
&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>